home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: cooper@hacktic.nl (cooper)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- Subject: Dutch analysis of Ecstasy(Re: FWD : Analysis of current `extasy')
- Date: 3 Feb 1994 12:17:22 +0100
- Message-ID: <2iqmggINNnam@xs4all.hacktic.nl>
-
- [Excellent analysis of Australian sample of MDEA deleted]
-
- In a recent visit to the Dutch Drugsadviesbureau (Drugs-advice-bureau) I
- was allowed to look into their unpublished samples analysis lists. It was
- for me at least an eye-opener. Several hundreds of street samples were listed
- with exact contents, along with shape, size and other markers by which to
- identify the samples. Basically, there were 4 categories:
-
- 1) It was what it was sold as.
- 2) There were impurities
- 3) It was a ripp-off
- 4) It was pure stuff, but of a different kind that it was sold as.
-
- Most samples (>75%) fell into categories 1 & 4. That includes MDMA being
- sold as MDEA, or vice versa, or MDA being sold as MDMA, or just MDMA being
- sold as MDMA. Category 2 only listed impurities being caffeine and a single
- case of MDA being mixed in with MDMA. (MDA being the impurity).
- The ripp-offs in category 3 where about 50/50 distributed between pure filler
- and caffeine (up to 250 whopping mg.) So their conclusion was that allthough
- you shouldn't risk being sold caffeine as MDMA, the quality is generally OK,
- if you don't mind a little caffeine (40 mg. or so ) added to your MD[ME]A.
-
- Dosages didn't vary that much lowest I saw was 75 mg. MDMA, highest 165.
- MDEA lowest 110, highest 150. So that's for the Dutch market. Anyone got
- info for other countries?
-
- --Cooper
-
-
-
-